Put AI to work inside your real operations.
I build AI agents that investigate incidents, prepare code and content changes, answer operational questions, and connect to the systems your business already runs—inside your AWS environment, with access that expands only as the system earns trust.
Who this engagement is for
Who this is for
- An owner or operator can name a recurring workflow—incident triage, content operations, cost analysis, order support, reporting—that consumes senior attention every week.
- Your systems already run on AWS, or you want the agent governed inside an AWS organization you control.
- The useful context lives across real systems: a CMS, ERP, commerce platform, repositories, observability, documents, or internal APIs.
- You want one narrow capability working in production before funding a broad transformation program.
Who this is NOT for
- You only need a marketing-site chatbot or a generic document Q&A tool. Buy the commodity product; custom engineering will not improve the economics.
- You want an innovation workshop with no operational workflow, system owner, or route to production.
- You expect unrestricted autonomy on day one. Access grows capability by capability; it is not granted as a blanket permission.
- The source data is unreliable and the underlying workflow has no system of record. Fix that foundation first, then automate it.
Where this engagement starts
The problem
Most AI pilots fail after the demo. The model can answer a question, but it does not know the business's actual systems, cannot verify its own work, and has no safe path to take action. The result is another chat window that produces suggestions while people still do the operational work by hand.
The opposite failure is just as common: broad credentials, vague instructions, and an agent that can change a live system without a dependable approval or audit trail. That is not useful autonomy. It is unbounded operational risk.
A production agent needs the same engineering discipline as any other critical system: a reliable source of context, explicit tools, capability-specific permissions, verification after action, and a human decision at the points where the cost of being wrong is high. The model matters. The operating system around it matters more.
See the operating model
One approved request becomes a live production change
This 63-second production walkthrough follows one feature request through repository inspection, visual mockups, a scoped approval, a verified pull request, deployment, the live result, and the audit evidence left inside the client's AWS account.
Read the visual transcript
00:00 — The live Fine's Gallery storefront shows product dimensions fixed in US units. 00:09 — The operator asks the agent in Slack to design and implement an imperial/metric preference without breaking existing product pages. 00:17 — The agent inspects the application and returns a proposed solution with visual mockups for review. 00:23 — The agent prepares the implementation and presents the exact external action for human approval. Nothing ships until the operator approves that scoped plan. 00:33 — The approved change becomes a pull request with modified files and verification evidence, then merges and deploys through the existing delivery path. 00:45 — The production storefront displays the completed unit toggle across multiple product types. 00:55 — CloudWatch records the request, tool activity, approval, and response inside the client's AWS account, leaving an auditable trace of the run.
Outcomes
What you walk away with
- 6 weeks to productionReference deploymentSource: Fine's Gallery repository history and runtime deployment
- One governed workflowInitial production scopeSource: Architecture and delivery plan
- Human-approvedExternal actionsSource: Tool-boundary approval records
- Client-controlledRuntime, repositories, and logsSource: Client AWS organization
- No long-lived keysAWS delivery credentialsSource: GitHub OIDC, IAM authentication, and STS
- End-to-end traceRequests, tools, approvals, and resultsSource: Production audit records
The approach
How this engagement runs
Start with one operational workflow where faster investigation or execution has obvious value. Define the trust boundary before granting access, ship a working slice in the client's AWS organization, and expand capability only when the evidence supports it. Amazon Bedrock keeps the model layer selectable: the system can use whichever available model best fits the task, latency target, and cost envelope without rebuilding the integrations around it.
Agent Architecture Sprint — $10K
Three weeks to map the workflow, systems, data, failure modes, approval points, and expected operating cost. The deliverable is a written architecture decision document—not a slide deck or a speculative prototype. If an agent is the wrong answer, the document says so before build money is spent.
Agent Production Build — from $25K
A production build starting at $25K puts one high-value workflow into production: the runtime, business-specific tools, required integrations, scoped access, and the operator experience in Slack or the interface your team already uses.
Govern and verify
External actions receive explicit approval gates where needed. Tool calls are logged. High-impact results are verified against the live system before the agent reports success. Access is narrow by default and can expand per capability as trust and requirements grow.
Operate, hand off, or extend
The agent, infrastructure, source code, runbook, and deployment pipeline remain in your organization. Continue under a Fractional CTO retainer, hand the system to an internal team, or add the next workflow as a separately reviewed capability.
Concrete deliverables
- A written architecture decision document covering the workflow, capability map, data boundaries, risk register, approval model, and operating-cost estimate
- A single-tenant production agent deployed inside your AWS organization
- A Bedrock model-selection and routing policy that can change as model availability, quality, latency, and cost change
- The agreed first workflow and its business-specific integrations—not a generic chat shell
- Capability-specific IAM, approval boundaries, and verification rules tied to the actual cost of failure
- Structured tool-call audit logs, traces, alarms, and a runbook for investigating agent behavior
- Infrastructure as code, CI/CD through GitHub OIDC, and no long-lived AWS credentials in the delivery path
- Source code, deployment pipeline, and operational documentation delivered into repositories and accounts you control
What clients say
“Mr. Peter, as our technology partner, built our entire commerce and operations platform from the ground up on AWS. It runs our website, our orders, our invoicing, our payments, everything. Migrating to the new system was seamless, with no interruption or data loss. Peter is honest, a strong communicator, and when something needs attention, he takes care of it fast. I trust him with the most important systems in my company. Highly recommended.”
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
The runtime, IAM, logs, source code, and deployment pipeline live in your AWS organization and repositories. Model calls go through Amazon Bedrock under your account. If the engagement ends, the system does not disappear behind a vendor login; you retain the deployed capability and the code that operates it.
Any model made available through Amazon Bedrock can be evaluated for the workload. The integrations, permissions, and business tools do not depend on one model family. A routing layer can select different models by task, or the deployment can standardize on one model and change it later without rebuilding the operating system around the agent.
Yes, when the workflow requires it and the access design supports it. The reference deployment began with operational metadata and separately gated content and engineering actions. Record- or invoice-level access is added as a purpose-built capability with the minimum fields and operations required, explicit logging, verification, and human approval where the cost of a wrong action warrants it. Read-only is a useful starting posture, not the ceiling of the architecture.
The architecture assumes it will be wrong sometimes. Reversible local work stays isolated. External changes can require approval. High-impact tools return verification evidence from the live system before the agent reports success. Every tool call is attributable to a request, session, input, output, and—when gated—an approver, so the question is not whether mistakes are possible; it is whether their blast radius and recovery path were designed in advance.
Usually, if the system exposes a stable API, database boundary, event stream, or command-line interface. The reference deployment integrates AWS operations, Payload CMS, GitHub, CloudWatch, and Cost Explorer. Each new integration is packaged as a separately testable capability with its own instructions and permissions.
The Agent Architecture Sprint runs for three weeks. A focused Agent Production Build is usually six to eight weeks after that; integration complexity and access review can change the schedule. The Fine's Gallery reference deployment went from first scaffold to production in six weeks.
The fixed-scope Agent Architecture Sprint is $10,000. Focused Agent Production Builds start at $25,000 and are quoted from the sprint's architecture and risk register. Model usage and AWS infrastructure are paid directly through your AWS account; there is no hidden per-seat agent platform fee from Conti Digital.
Bring one workflow that consumes senior attention and the systems it crosses. A free 30-minute consultation is enough to decide whether it belongs in the $10K Agent Architecture Sprint. If the problem is actually bad process, unreliable data, or missing system boundaries, I will say that before proposing an agent.
Related work
See this in production
Fine's Gallery: An AI Operations Agent for Real Work
In six weeks, I deployed a single-tenant AI operations agent inside Fine's Gallery's AWS organization. Operated from Slack, its business-specific capabilities investigate production systems, analyze cost, prepare CMS and engineering changes, and route high-impact actions through human approval—while keeping the model layer replaceable and access expandable per capability.
Fine's Gallery Platform Modernization
Fine’s Gallery began with a catalog-only website: customers could browse thousands of high-value products, but they could not complete payment online. Sales happened through staff, phone, email, showroom conversations, FileMaker, and disconnected vendor tools. I built the first transactional commerce and operations platform inside the client’s own AWS Organization. It now supports millions in annual revenue, including six-figure monthly commerce volume; migrated 28,062 invoices and more than 20 years of operating history without loss or duplicate invoice numbers; and cut over with zero downtime. The custom quote, deposit, ACH, wire, check, signature, fulfillment, acquisition-feed, and staff workflows are now operated through a Fractional CTO retainer.
Bring the workflow, not an AI wish list
Describe the recurring operational work, the systems it crosses, and what a wrong action would cost. I will respond with whether it fits an Agent Architecture Sprint, needs prerequisite systems work, or is better served by an existing product.
Pressure-test the platform decision before you commit budget.
Schedule a complimentary 30-minute consultation to align on objectives, stress-test your architecture, and leave with a concrete set of recommendations. No obligation, no sales pitch. Just actionable technical guidance.